The spending came as Trump has been battling multiple lawsuits and dozens of felony charges in four criminal cases.
“Save America Dominates Expenditure, Allocating 84% to Legal Costs: Trump’s Campaign and Fundraising Entities Contribute $76.7 Million in Legal Fees, According to 2022 FEC Data and AP Review.”
As legal challenges continue to mount in the lead-up to the U.S. Presidential Elections, former President Donald Trump has allocated a substantial $76 million for his legaldefense, signaling a proactive stance in addressing the increasing legal complexities surrounding him. The allocation of such a significant financial resource underscores the magnitude of the legal battles that Trump is currently navigating, suggesting a robust strategy to counter legal challenges and potential legal threats.
The funds, primarily designated for legal defense, are anticipated to be utilized in addressing a spectrum of legal issues that the former president is facing, ranging from lawsuits to potential criminal charges. The move reflects a concerted effort to ensure a robust defense against various legal fronts, showcasing Trump’s commitment to safeguarding his interests and reputation amidst the intricate legal landscape.
As part of this legal defense strategy, Trump’s team is likely to engage in hiring seasoned legal professionals, employing expert witnesses, and covering litigation expenses. This comprehensive approach suggests a proactive stance, as the former president seeks to navigate legal intricacies and challenges that may arise in the lead-up to the upcoming presidential elections.
Trump’s campaign paid Atlanta attorney Steven Sadow USD 1.5 million in the second half of 2023. Trump hired Sadow to represent him in the Georgia election subversion case.Campaign money was also used to pay attorneys who have represented co-defendants and potential witnesses in the Trump cases. Brand Woodward Law in Washington received USD 660,000, with the bulk of that money coming in 2023. One of the firm’s clients, Trump valet Walt Nauta, is accused to scheming to conceal Mar-a-Lago security camera footage from government investigators.
But Bartov, hired for his expert perspective, testified in early December he found no evidence of accounting fraud.
Engoron, the judge, sharply and publicly criticized Bartov in a decision he issued less than two weeks later. Engoron wrote that he’d previously ruled there were numerous and obvious errors in Trump’s financial statements.
“By doggedly attempting to justify every misstatement, Professor Bartov lost all credibility,” the judge wrote.